Skip to main content

Shear Behaviour of Geosynthetic Clay Liner (GCL) Interfacing with Manufactured Sand

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 89))

Abstract

In view of the problems of sand extraction and its harmful impact on coastal erosion, research now focusses on viable alternatives. Manufactured sand (Msand) has become an admissible alternative to be used in concrete instead of river sand. In countries like India, sand mining is illegal, considering the adverse effects it can cause to river basins. Replacement of river sand with Msand as a suitable subgrade or capping material in landfills needs to be investigated. When Geosynthetic Clay Liners (GCL) are used on sloping grounds, interface friction between GCL and the base soil becomes important to ensure bonding and arrest slippage issues. While the interface shear characteristics of natural sand with GCLs are well established in the literature, not many studies are reported on the interface characteristics of GCLs and Msand. This study is an approach towards understanding the interface shear strength parameters of GCLs with manufactured sand and compare them against those of river sand under identical loading conditions. To avoid the effects of morphology, identical gradation of both the sands is used in the tests. This gradation is arithmetic average of grain sizes of both the sands, which is achieved by tweaking with the proportions of different sized grains. Chemical analysis of both the sands is carried out for comparison using X-ray diffraction. A GCL with bentonite sandwiched between a woven geotextile on one side and nonwoven geotextile on the other side is used in the tests. Interfacing surface is a nonwoven geotextile in all the tests. Interface shear tests are carried out on river Sand-GCL and Msand-GCL interfaces to obtain adhesion and interface friction angle of both these interfaces. Further, damage assessment of GCL surface due to interaction with these two different types of sands is carried out using Optical Microscopy and image analysis. Results from these studies provided clear directions towards the replacement of river sand with Msand in landfills in terms of interface friction characteristics and the comparative surficial changes in GCLs with the indentation of sand particles, which can give confidence about sand replacement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Marr WA (2001) Interface and internal shear testing procedures to obtain peak and residual values. In: Proceedings of 15th GRI conference: hot topics in geosynthethics II, pp 1–28

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zanzinger H (2016) Contribution to the long-term shear strength of a needle punched GCL. Int J Geosynth Gr Eng (2):8

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rowe KR (2018) Geosynthetic clay liners: perceptions and misconceptions. In: Proceedings of international conference on geosynthetics

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rowe KR, Orsini C (2003) Effect of GCL and subgrade type on internal erosion in GCLs under high gradients. Geotext Geomembranes 21(1):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zaini M, Kasa A, Nayan K (2012) Interface shear strength of Geosynthetic Clay Liner (GCL) and residual soil. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 43–45

    Google Scholar 

  6. Li Y (2013) Effects of particle shape and size distribution on the shear strength behaviour of composite soils. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72(3):371–381

    Google Scholar 

  7. Afzali-Nejad A, Lashkari A, Shourijeh PT (2017) Influence of particle shape on the shear strength and dilation of sand-woven geotextile interfaces. Geotext Geomembranes 45(1):54–66

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sochan A, Zieliński P, Bieganowski A (2015) Selection of shape parameters that differentiate sand grains, based on the automatic analysis of two-dimensional images. Sediment Geol (327):14–20

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anjali G. Pillai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pillai, A.G., Latha, G.M. (2020). Shear Behaviour of Geosynthetic Clay Liner (GCL) Interfacing with Manufactured Sand. In: Reddy, K.R., Agnihotri, A.K., Yukselen-Aksoy, Y., Dubey, B.K., Bansal, A. (eds) Sustainable Environmental Geotechnics. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 89. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51350-4_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51350-4_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51349-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51350-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics