Abstract
In view of the problems of sand extraction and its harmful impact on coastal erosion, research now focusses on viable alternatives. Manufactured sand (Msand) has become an admissible alternative to be used in concrete instead of river sand. In countries like India, sand mining is illegal, considering the adverse effects it can cause to river basins. Replacement of river sand with Msand as a suitable subgrade or capping material in landfills needs to be investigated. When Geosynthetic Clay Liners (GCL) are used on sloping grounds, interface friction between GCL and the base soil becomes important to ensure bonding and arrest slippage issues. While the interface shear characteristics of natural sand with GCLs are well established in the literature, not many studies are reported on the interface characteristics of GCLs and Msand. This study is an approach towards understanding the interface shear strength parameters of GCLs with manufactured sand and compare them against those of river sand under identical loading conditions. To avoid the effects of morphology, identical gradation of both the sands is used in the tests. This gradation is arithmetic average of grain sizes of both the sands, which is achieved by tweaking with the proportions of different sized grains. Chemical analysis of both the sands is carried out for comparison using X-ray diffraction. A GCL with bentonite sandwiched between a woven geotextile on one side and nonwoven geotextile on the other side is used in the tests. Interfacing surface is a nonwoven geotextile in all the tests. Interface shear tests are carried out on river Sand-GCL and Msand-GCL interfaces to obtain adhesion and interface friction angle of both these interfaces. Further, damage assessment of GCL surface due to interaction with these two different types of sands is carried out using Optical Microscopy and image analysis. Results from these studies provided clear directions towards the replacement of river sand with Msand in landfills in terms of interface friction characteristics and the comparative surficial changes in GCLs with the indentation of sand particles, which can give confidence about sand replacement.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Marr WA (2001) Interface and internal shear testing procedures to obtain peak and residual values. In: Proceedings of 15th GRI conference: hot topics in geosynthethics II, pp 1–28
Zanzinger H (2016) Contribution to the long-term shear strength of a needle punched GCL. Int J Geosynth Gr Eng (2):8
Rowe KR (2018) Geosynthetic clay liners: perceptions and misconceptions. In: Proceedings of international conference on geosynthetics
Rowe KR, Orsini C (2003) Effect of GCL and subgrade type on internal erosion in GCLs under high gradients. Geotext Geomembranes 21(1):1–24
Zaini M, Kasa A, Nayan K (2012) Interface shear strength of Geosynthetic Clay Liner (GCL) and residual soil. Int J Adv Sci Eng Inf Technol 43–45
Li Y (2013) Effects of particle shape and size distribution on the shear strength behaviour of composite soils. Bull Eng Geol Environ 72(3):371–381
Afzali-Nejad A, Lashkari A, Shourijeh PT (2017) Influence of particle shape on the shear strength and dilation of sand-woven geotextile interfaces. Geotext Geomembranes 45(1):54–66
Sochan A, Zieliński P, Bieganowski A (2015) Selection of shape parameters that differentiate sand grains, based on the automatic analysis of two-dimensional images. Sediment Geol (327):14–20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pillai, A.G., Latha, G.M. (2020). Shear Behaviour of Geosynthetic Clay Liner (GCL) Interfacing with Manufactured Sand. In: Reddy, K.R., Agnihotri, A.K., Yukselen-Aksoy, Y., Dubey, B.K., Bansal, A. (eds) Sustainable Environmental Geotechnics. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 89. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51350-4_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51350-4_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51349-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51350-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)